DONOR SELECTION and EMBRYO FLUSHING SCHEDULE
The
selection of donor cows is a process in which numerous factors will determine
the ultimate success or failure of an embryo transfer program. The most important factor is that the donor
is truly a superior animal, phenotypically and genetically. Although not essential, reproductive
soundness of the donor is important to consider. The factors to be considered are listed below.
Phenotypic
selection
In beef
cattle, donor selection can be based on several type and production
traits. The type traits can include
general conformation, proportion, height (frame score), mature body weight,
scrotal circumference, udder type, pelvic measurements and carcass traits such
rib eye cross section area (muscle size), marbling, back fat thickness and
yield grade or percent retail product. Dairy cattle, of coarse, are also
selected based on milk production traits such as total milk production, butter
fat content and protein content.
Many
registered and commercial cattle breeders obtain individual animal data for
production and body type. This data is
used to calculate a group index. These
indexes rank the cows or their calves, within the herd, or more specifically
within a contemporary group, for many production traits. A group index for a particular trait (such
as weaning weight) will rank an individual as a percentage above or below the
average within its contemporary group.
The trait average is assigned an index of 100. An animal that performs at 110% of average will be assigned an
index 110. An inferior animal will have
an index of 90, because it only performed at 90% of average. Individual animal measurements and the trait
indexes calculated from them are used for breeding animal selection within a
herd. Since a group index will rank all
animals in a contemporary group from top to bottom, it is easy to select the
top 10% of a male contemporary group as sire prospects, or the top 33% of a
female contemporary group as replacement heifers.
Genetic
selection
Cattle
breeders can increase selection power by utilizing genetic statistics that
incorporate production data not only for the individual in question, but also
production data from its offspring, ancestors, siblings and other relatives. Breed associations, Dairy Herd Improvement
Associations (DHIA), the USDA, and other organizations that have access to data
from large numbers of cattle, can calculate genetic statistics for the
individual animal based on its own performance and also the performance of all
its recorded relatives. Genetic
statistics are very helpful in making breeding decisions. Donor cows (and the
bulls that are used for embryo production) are selected for calving ease
traits, pre-weaning growth, yearling weight, carcass traits, maternal traits
and milk production.
Individual
animal data (phenotypic data) is submitted to breed associations, DHIA, etc. on
thousands of animals from many different herds. This data, combined with data
from related animals already submitted over time, is used in calculations that
result in statistical predictors of an animals performance and more importantly
the performance of those animals progeny.
These statistics are called “Expected Progeny Difference” (EPD) for beef
cattle and “Predicted Transmitting Ability” (PTA) for dairy cattle. EPD and PTA statistics are published in sire
summaries for most popular sires.
Breeders can obtain EPD or PTA statistics for every animal in their
herd. EPD and PTA data tends to become
more accurate as an animal gets older since the calculations are updated with
production data from the individuals offspring. The accuracy is expressed as a decimal percentage. .98 is a very high accuracy score for an
EPD.
Embryo
donor and sire candidates can be selected based on group indexes and also EPD
scores for birth weight, weaning weight and yearling weight, maternal ability
(milking ability) and carcass traits, or in dairy PTA scores for total milk,
total fat, total protein, percent fat and percent protein. In dairy cattle there is also a genetic
statistic called a “Total Production Index” (TPI) which ranks a cow on overall
genetic merit.
It is
rare that an animal will excel in all production traits mentioned above. When an animal is evaluated as a embryo
donor (or AI sire) prospect, a breeder will usually choose a few traits that
are of import within his herd for genetic improvement or for cattle marketing
purposes. Animals that excel in these
traits (even if only average in other traits) are selected to effect genetic
improvement for those traits.
Donor's
reproductive status
Once
genetically qualified cows have been selected as donor candidates, final
selection of the animals should also include reproductive and general health
exams, and health test results. Other
criteria may become apparent on an individual animal basis. It is essential to have good restraint and
adequate help when performing this physical exam. It is helpful to have help for sampling, control of the animal
during examination and for thorough record keeping, etc. Each donor should pass a physical exam of
all organ systems and the reproductive tract to assure general health and sound
reproductive status. Some particular
aspects of the reproductive system exam follow. Some of the conditions mentioned below do not effect the cows
ability to conceive but do affect her usability and success as an embryo
donor. Virtually none of the conditions
listed below are not absolute reasons to exclude a cow as a donor but they
should still be considered as donor selection is occurring. Some of the defects listed below, such as
urine pooling, short cervix and excessively long vagina / deep uterus may
affect fertility and can be considered genetic traits that should not be
propagated.
A. Crooked
cervix, if extreme, may be a hindrance to flushing. This condition is seen
frequently in Holsteins and Zebu breeds.
B. Prolapsed
cervical rings. Appears as a caudal
enlargement of the cervix. May be
reason to cull a cow as a donor if it is also associated with a shortening of
the cervix. Can act as a source of
chronic infection of the cervix, hindrance to flushing and can also compromise
the cervical seal and result in chronic metritis and early embryonic loss if
severe.
C. Short
cervix. See above under prolapsed
cervical rings
D. Cervicitis
is detectable by irregularity in the size and consistency of the cervix and
presence of vaginal discharge.
E. Vaginitis.
From a myriad of specific and nonspecific causes such as IBR/IPV,
F. Ureoplasma,
Mycoplasma and non-specific infections.
If present it is reason to expel an animal from the donor program until
resolved. The vulvar lips are always
parted and the vulva and vaginal vestibule are examined during a reproductive
exam in order to uncover these conditions.
A speculum may be used to perform a vaginal and cervical exam
G. Metritis,
Pyometra, Mucometra are all conditions which interfere with fertility. Cows that have fluid in the uterus,
regardless of cause should be diagnosed and treated prior to use as a donor.
H. Pregnancy. If pregnancy has not advanced beyond 90 days
the donor candidate may be aborted using prostaglandin F2 alpha. Time for at least one natural estrus cycle
prior to synchronization of estrus for flushing should be allowed (30-40 days). Pregnant cows beyond the first trimester
should be skipped over as donors and used the following year.
I. Urine
Pooling. Frequently seen in cows with:
a tipped forward pelvic conformation, restricted vulva, sacroiliac luxation,
pelvic ligament damage resulting in elongation of the vestibule and vagina
(usually caused by calving related injuries and dystocia). These cows will pass
excess yellow stained mucous when the vagina is expressed caudally or when
mounting another cow. It is a good idea
to check for this condition if a cow with a very deep uterus is examined. This condition may require surgery before
successful embryo recoveries can be performed.
This may be adequate reason to expel a donor candidate.
J. Deep
Uterus. Cows with deep uteri and long
vaginas are sometimes difficult to flush embryos from. This is not to say that they have any
fertility problems or are undesirable for routine breeding purposes. They are less than ideal donor but still may
be used as long as the deep uterus is not caused by a pathological
condition. Problem can results from
trauma to the endometrium and cervix resulting from excess manipulation
required to flush embryos from a cow with this type of uterine conformation.
Donor
selection schedule
At least
4 to 6 weeks before the anticipated date of the first embryo collection it is
necessary to select the donor cows, whether embryos are to be transferred fresh
or frozen. As soon as possible all
candidates should be examined, receive vaccinations, parasite treatments and
export health testing to verify that the donor meets the importing country’s
import requirements if the embryos are to be exported. Vaccinations should be given at least 30
days prior to the estrus period in which the donor is bred for embryo production. In addition, it is advisable to deliver the
donor to the embryo collection center a month prior to embryo collection so
that she has time to acclimate.